Root Causes of Tech Fascism
Tech fascism emerges from capitalism. Structural, economic, social and geopolitical factors have made its rise inevitable.
This document is based on the research found throughout the site, and summarizes the root causes behind the rise of tech fascism.
Efficiency of startups through the centralized venture capital body
Acceleration of technology through genocide, war and conflict
Competition between China and Silicon Valley technological development
Vulnerability of American democracy to corruption and corporate capture
Conflict with social justice movements and visibility into global resistance efforts
Concentration in the venture capital space, collaboration between venture capital firms, creation of venture capital cartels; Emergence of venture capital megafunds
Over time, the venture capital space has become more and more concentrated, with a smaller number of firms controlling more and more of the capital. This has accelerated in recent years, with the same top firms grabbing the majority of the money. In 2025, Andreessen Horowitz alone captured 18% of venture capital dollars.
Andreessen Horowitz has stated that the new paradigm of venture capital will consist of just four to five venture capital "megafunds", orbited by smaller boutique firms that serve specialized interests and markets. Boutique firms themselves are forced to follow in the footsteps of larger VC firms in order to get access to deals, as they cannot fund startups on their own. The decisions about what startups to back, technologies to fund, markets to enter, and geopolitical strategies, are ultimately controlled by a cartel with a small number of immensely powerful venture capitalists at the lead.
The term "dry powder" refers to the amount of cash on hand that venture capital firms have to invest in startups; it provides useful metrics to understand what is happening in venture capital. Pitchbook notes that
"As VC firms move earlier and grow larger, dry powder has become concentrated in megafunds. Funds of $500 million or more now account for nearly 58.7% of dry powder in the market, up from 39.9% a decade ago. Conversely, small funds, which make up the largest group by fund size, have seen their share of dry powder fall to just 16% of the total available... As a market, VC has essentially divided into several substrategies: megafunds, pre-seed funds, and the rest. This has resulted in a notable concentration of commitments and dry powder, as megafunds continue to grow in number and size... Ultimately, the next few years of VC may simply be a more concentrated model than the market is used to."
Pitchbook summarizes: "Fewer companies now account for a larger portion of total deal value, while fewer funds represent a larger portion of closed commitments. The power law is fundamental to venture capital, but recent market shifts have obscured the true state of US venture—and created a potentially problematic structure for the industry moving forward."
The distribution of funding to startups has also concentrated significantly, with fewer and fewer startups commanding the most investment; Crunchbase notes that 2025 was "marked by capital concentration. Of the 10 most highly valued private companies, seven raised new funding at significantly higher valuations in 2025. Close to 60% of invested capital went to 629 companies that raised rounds of $100 million or more, Crunchbase data shows. More than a third of global funding went to 68 companies that raised rounds of $500 million or more in 2025, compared to 24% of funding in 2024."
While venture capitalists project a narrative of competition, venture capital firms actually work closely together across thousands of startups, bringing their combined power to bear on promoting the entire portfolio. There is a core of venture capital firms -- among them, Y Combinator, Andreessen Horowitz, General Catalyst, Founders Fund, Lux Capital, Sequoia, In-Q-Tel and others -- that work together in lockstep. The American Dynamism category is an example of this, in which many firms signed up simultaneously for an agenda of defense investment, war mongering, lobbying, genocide and Zionism, and have acted as one to execute on the category. Crypto is another example, with venture capital firms working together to assemble the core infrastructure needed to make crypto a viable global economic system, marketing it, lobbying for it, and stimulating adoption around the world.
With just a few firms dominating the market, a very small group of venture capitalists are able to decide what gets built, how it is deployed, how to construct a market around new technologies, and how to get the most return out of the investments. Operating in a cartel formation with nation-state alliances in Israel, Saudi Arabia, and governments in Latin America, venture capitalists have captured significant portions of the production of technology, and operate it as a dictatorship.
Diversification of venture capital beyond software
The venture capital class initially established itself through software and consumer and enterprise applications, leveraging the hardware production of giants like Apple, Nvidia and Oracle to deliver their products. Across the web 2.0 bubble -- defined by the iPhone, cloud computing and social media -- venture capitalists quickly began to diversify into new areas in order to expand their market and power. Venture capital is under constant pressure to hit high returns to its investors, with overall performance varying widely across years and firms, creating vulnerability in the asset class and prompting diversification. At the same time, expansion became possible due to the increasing amount of capital they were able to access and deploy on the heels of major web 2.0 successes.
The move into hardware development was catalyzed by venture capital's creation of defense and weapons companies, such as Anduril, which was founded in 2017. Anduril now runs multiple factories and creates many different form factors of autonomous hardware, from drones to seacraft. Hundreds of other defense startups have followed, particularly with deployment into live conflict in Ukraine and the genocide in Gaza. These events have significantly accelerated satellite technology, sensor technology, autonomous technology, artificial intelligence, surveillance and venture capital factories.
Venture capital has simultaneously expanded into manufacturing in general, biotech, energy and transportation, all requiring a larger footprint. The Network State becomes a platform for manufacturing, factory-building and construction. Meanwhile, seeing an opportunity to get into the energy space with the dawn of AI, venture capitalists are developing nuclear power startups at a rapid pace. Through these expansions -- a direct result of diversification strategies -- venture capitalists have increasingly more infrastructure under their control, and have been operating in many new markets all at once.
Efficiency of startups through the centralized venture capital body
Importantly, this vast infrastructure build-out is centrally managed by venture capital, allowing them to benefit from coordination across hundreds and thousands of startups. While it is popular to make fun of tech startups and venture capitalists, and the personalities behind them, venture capital is a dynamic, productive, efficient machine, able to generate and run thousands of companies simultaneously.
Because venture capitalists run so many tech companies, they reap the economies and efficiencies of scale. Learnings and breakthroughs from one startup can permeate the ecosystem quickly. Top tech executives and engineers can be deployed into the most critical areas and moved around fluidly. Best practices for coding, running teams and growing startups -- many learned through expensive trial and error -- evolve into hardened operational strategies. Sharing a funding background, startups partner alongside each other with ease, and work together closely to execute on overall industry priorities.
Meanwhile, innovations in AI are fed into weapons, defense and manufacturing startups; market intelligence from the full operating sphere is used across the entire portfolio; customers use many interoperable vendors from the same venture capital origin point, and so forth. Startups as a collective also benefit from the multi-use Network State project: biotech startups get access to unregulated testing sites, crypto startups obtain tax shelters, and weapons companies get strategic military locations and weapons manufacturing zones.
Andreessen Horowitz was a major innovator of these models, getting deeply involved in startup management at each company and developing a system for supporting and integrating startups in every aspect; from Andreessen Horowitz:
"For founders trying to build the next iconic company, the scaled venture firms provide a compelling product. They offer expertise and full-service offerings for everything a rapidly scaling company needs—recruiting, go-to-market strategy, legal, finance, communications, government relations. They offer enough capital to actually get you where you need to go, rather than forcing you to ration resources and move slowly against well-funded competitors. They offer gigantic reach—access to everyone you need to know in business and government, introductions to every Fortune 500 CEO and every world leader who matters. They offer access to 100 times more talent, with a network that spans tens of thousands of the best engineers, executives, and operators in the world, ready to join your company when you need them. And they’re everywhere you need to be—which, for the most ambitious founders, is everywhere."
This strategy gives mega firms like Andreessen Horowitz unprecedented control and influence over the startup. Venture capitalists have operationalized the development of startups into an increasingly assembly-line like function. The focus is not on "hoping" that a startup is successful, or "gambling" on new technologies, but bringing all the resources of the venture capital firm to bear on making it successful, and constructing startups into a full market offering as cogs of the same machine. This environment also makes tech workers extremely susceptible to ideological programming by venture capitalists, resulting in increasing radicalization across the tech class.
With this level of coordination, startups working together can achieve extraordinarily higher level goals like influencing foreign governments, manipulating geopolitics, engineering elections, coups of countries (including America), running wars and governments, and building out their own state, the Network State.
Emergence of sovereignty from diversification
Through expansion into so many different markets, with the goal of establishing their own monopolies in each one, venture capitalists have now developed major pillars of sovereignty.
This includes their own currencies and financial system, their own military and intelligence agencies, their own medical infrastructure, school system, media ecosystem, and even weapons of mass destruction, which they are seeking to develop through a new Manhattan Project, documented in the book The Technological Republic by Palantir CEO Alex Karp. Venture capitalists have their own leaders, their own sovereign land through the Network State, their own computing systems, their own worker body, geopolitical alliances, and their own identity and ideology. They have a breeding project with the aim of increasing the population of their class, part of a developing civilizational mission.
From developing all the pillars of sovereignty as a result of capitalist expansion, venture capitalists now aim to create a sovereign distributed state. This is the Network State.
While much tech critique asserts that ideology is the origin and motivation of material developments, closer study indicates that economic and infrastructure developments have in fact produced the ideology.
Competition against existing monopolies
Venture capital's move into medical development, manufacturing, weapons and defense, and fintech have brought them into competition with established monopolies in those sectors, forcing them to develop new strategies to unseat incumbents and open markets for them. Regulations, practices and norms shaped by existing market dynamics and incumbents are impediments, and must be neutralized.
Working on accelerated timeframes, venture capitalists have adopted aggressive and destructive strategies, such as attacking regulatory bodies, backing extremist politicians, and spending billions of dollars on lobbying campaigns and campaign contributions in order to ensure market entry and domination of their startups.
As one example of monopoly competition, venture capital's new biotech startups cover a large surface area, from drug development, clinical trials, "vaccine alternatives", home care, diagnostics, oncology, IVF and fertility treatment, and many others. They have faced significant regulatory hurdles from the FDA, other medical bodies and large pharmaceutical companies.
As they work to weaken and compete with these bodies, the development of the Network State is providing zones where they can carry out medical testing without oversight. In Honduras, doctors have been fighting back against unregulated clinical testing by venture capitalists in the Network State of Próspera, but have yet to find any recourse. Going up against established companies, clinical systems and "Big Pharma", venture capitalists seek a competitive advantage through unrestricted medical testing. Such strategies are designed to help them compete with existing players who are more entrenched and have significantly more capital to spend on research and development.
Additionally, biotech VCs have sought and attained key positions in the Department of Health and Human Services, while Andreessen Horowitz works closely with health secretary RFK Jr. Peter Thiel executive Jim O'Neill, while serving as acting director of the CDC, approved an unethical trial targeting 14,000 Black babies in Guinea-Bissau for a controversial vaccine study.
In the case of military technology, venture capitalists face entrenched monopolies in the form of Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Electric and others, while going against a procurement system developed around those monopolies. This provides a core motivation for venture capitalists to attempt greater and greater influence over the military, seen in massive Department of Defense contracts, the appointment of venture capitalists to high level military positions, and intervention in the U.S. executive power.
In the financial arena, the crypto financial system faces entrenched competition from banks and financial institutions. The 2025 annual report from JP Morgan Chase acknowledges the threat from the tech industry, noting "our rivals increasingly include a large and growing set of nontraditional and fintech competitors globally in areas such as payments, digital banking and investing, and global market making... a whole new set of competitors is emerging based on blockchain, which includes stablecoins, smart contracts and other forms of tokenization... We need to roll out our own blockchain technology." Venture capitalists are in tense competition with the financial giants, and are moving aggressively to overcome them, as in other markets.
Diversification of Saudi Arabia beyond oil; Expansion of venture capital through Middle East sovereign wealth funds
In 2016, Saudi Arabia launched its Vision 2030 project under Mohammed bin Salman [MBS], with the explicit goal of developing non-oil revenue sources and diversifying the country's economy. Major pillars of Vision 2030 include so-called "giga projects", economic zones, new and revitalized cities, and major investments in the technology and energy sectors, with de-regulation a core principle.
Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, Public Investment Fund [PIF], is spearheading the Vision 2030 program. It has $925 billion of assets under management, and claims over 220 portfolio companies. According to PIF, "PIF is driving the growth of new sectors, companies and jobs, as a catalyst of Vision 2030. As a global impactful investor, the Fund has a world-class investment portfolio with a focus on sustainable investments, both domestically and internationally..."; a quote from MBS states "PIF is evolving into a primary driver of Saudi economic growth. We have doubled its scope and we will continue with steady steps towards realizing its Vision 2030 objectives."
Technological development is one of the biggest themes of Vision 2030, with the effort to develop a competitive technology industry within Saudi Arabia. Current initiatives focus on aerospace and defense development, financial services, and AI technology. PIF is making significant investments in artificial intelligence, telecom and internet-of-things, stating "PIF and its companies are actively investing in building an AI ecosystem and fostering international AI partnerships. These investments benefit from Saudi Arabia’s value proposition, including its strategic location at the nexus of three continents, which enables large volumes of data to be processed, as well as the country’s economic growth prospects and young, tech-savvy population, which support cutting-edge AI research and innovation."
Through its venture capital arm, Sanabil Investments, Saudi Arabia has invested heavily in extremist U.S. venture capitalists, including Andreessen Horowitz, Founders Fund, Craft Ventures, Techstars, Innovation Endeavors, Polychain Capital, Blockchain Capital, 500 Global and others. Saudi Arabia has become a key funder of venture capital projects, flooding the venture market with foreign money which has allowed it to grow and take on increasingly more ambitious and global projects. Venture capitalists, with experience building thousands of startups over decades, have the institutional knowledge and infrastructure to essentially loan out their services as the building blocks of new technological superpowers. They are able to become critical partners to sovereigns. Tied to governments, sovereign wealth funds are also a connection to the militaries of these countries.
Venture capital has entered key partnerships not only with Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth fund, but other sovereign funds across the Middle East, such as the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA). ADIA has funded Andreessen Horowitz, Founders Fund (Peter Thiel), 8VC (Joe Lonsdale) and Thrive Capital (Josh Kushner); the relationship between Middle East funds, venture capitalists and the Trump family has ushered in a new era of tech fascism. The Mubadala sovereign investment fund of Abu Dhabi is also an investor in U.S. venture firm DCVC, and co-invests in startups with Silicon Valley venture capital frequently. In 2024, Abu Dhabi launched the MGX fund to accelerate artificial intelligence in the region. MGX is partnered with BlackRock, Microsoft, Silver Lake, and is heavily invested in U.S. tech infrastructure projects involving many key players.
In 2024, the Israeli government launched the Yozma 2.0 fund to direct public money into venture capital firms; this is in addition to Israel's Vintage Investment Partners, which has funded Andreessen Horowitz, Bessemer, Kleiner Perkins and Ribbit Capital, among others.
The sovereign wealth fund model is also being proposed by venture capital for the U.S. government, with Andreessen Horowitz stating in August 2025: "Pension funds, sovereign wealth vehicles, insurance giants, and endowments are the real force multipliers. With the right risk frameworks, the right incentives, and the right long-term view, they can anchor the capital stack for a generational rearmament of the American industrial and innovation base."
On February 3rd, 2025, the White House published "A Plan For Establishing A United States Sovereign Wealth Fund." Andreessen Horowitz and its partners and crypto companies have made enormous contributions to Trump's presidential campaign.
Geopolitical relationship with Israel
Israeli firms fund U.S. venture capital firms and their startups, while Silicon Valley venture capital funds and acquires Israeli startups, recruits from the IDF and Israeli intelligence agencies, and sends its weapons to Israel where they are used in the genocide. Israel's tech industry and U.S. venture capital work together consistently, giving venture capitalists a stake in Israel and the Middle East, as well as funding and a market for their weapons companies.
Immediately following October 7th, venture capitalists engaged in an enormous propaganda campaign in support of Israel. Palantir took out a full-page ad in the New York Times, and over 800 venture capital firms signed a pledge in support of Israel. Their portfolio companies joined the public relations campaign on behalf of Israel.
Venture capitalists see Israel as a technocratic state, and a natural partner and aspirational nation for the Network State. The Network State project has openly stated that Israel is its inspiration, calling it a "decentralized Zion” and stating "The Jewish people were once a stateless nation, a diaspora group united by common ancestry and tradition without a land or government to call their own. Then, within living memory, they founded the state of Israel.”
The genocide opens the opportunity for venture capitalists to attain land in partnership with Israel. Their support of the genocide -- financially, ideologically, and with weapons including lethal weapons systems in the "kill chain" -- secures their relationship with Israel and lines them up for a significant payday. Plans for a mega development project on top of Gaza is likely to result in land and resources for U.S. venture capitalists.
Alliance with CIA
The CIA has been involved in Silicon Valley since its earliest days, providing initial funding to Oracle and its first customer. In 1999, at the height of the dot com era, the CIA opened its own venture capital firm, I-Q-Tel, to bring Silicon Valley technologies into the intelligence and defense community. Since then, In-Q-Tel has funded hundreds of companies across many major areas of tech development. For decades now, top venture capitalists have worked closely with CIA executives as they worked together to deliver products to markets both within and outside of the government.
In 2025, In-Q-Tel announced it had reached 800 investments, stating "We're thrilled to announce that IQT closed our 800th investment — a monumental achievement in our mission to invest in global innovation to secure the nation! That's 800 companies advancing the cause of #nationalsecurity, 800 companies driving innovation for America and its allies, and 800 companies pushing the boundaries of what is possible."
In-Q-Tel has invested in database and AI technologies, as well as many defense startups, often in conjunction with Andreessen Horowitz, Founders Fund, General Catalyst and other major venture investors in the weapons and defense space. This has put the CIA both deep in the data stack as well as entrenched them in the new generation of drones, surveillance, AI targeting, new autonomous warcraft, hypersonic missiles and other technologies being developed by Silicon Valley.
This relationship is particularly notable in light of the CIA's history of coups in Africa and Latin America, in the same regions which are now being targeted by Network State colonies. In this re-colonization, CIA emerges as a key technology partner and funding arm.
Acceleration of technology through genocide, war and conflict
Venture capitalists gained a live arena of war through the Ukraine war and Israel's genocide of Palestinians. This has allowed them to rapidly test their new weapons startups and advance their weapons technology, particularly in the arena of drones and autonomous targeting. As well-documented, this has been led by Palantir and Anduril but also encompassed a number of other weapons startups who have seen their first real-world implementation in these conflict zones. Drone startups Shield AI and Skydio have emerged as key forces in the genocide of Palestinians. Technologies like Lavender, an advanced AI targeting system, have emerged in the genocide as well.
From Time: "With the Russians threatening to topple Zelensky’s democratically elected government and occupy the country, Kyiv needed all the help it could get. But soon, government officials realized they had a chance to develop the country’s own tech sector. From European capitals to Silicon Valley, [Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s Minister of Digital Transformation] and his deputies began marketing the battlefields of Ukraine as laboratories for the latest military technologies. 'Our big mission is to make Ukraine the world’s tech R&D lab,' Fedorov says."
CNN notes "the war in Ukraine has also offered the United States and its allies a rare opportunity to study how their own weapons systems perform under intense use – and what munitions both sides are using to score wins in this hotly fought modern war."
Anduril has stated of their battlefield R&D:
"... even the best test ranges can only approximate the complexity of actual warfare, which is why aggressive, repeated, real-world testing remains essential. Nowhere is this clearer than in Ukraine. Ukraine remains the most contested, data-rich, and technologically volatile battlespace in the world. It has been described as a 'testbed' for defense innovation because the conditions reveal how systems perform against a capable and adaptive enemy... throughout the war, we have maintained an almost continuous in-country presence, funded by our own internal R&D. Our engineers work alongside Ukrainian units, observing how systems behave under jamming, collecting real-time data, deploying updates, and validating improvements under combat conditions. That proximity has accelerated our understanding of this environment in ways that no controlled test range could match."
These arenas have also given venture capitalists a large stream of government contracts, pumping money into their growing war machine. War is a time-tested accelerant of new technologies; lethal AI, autonomous vehicles, drone swarms and counter-drone technologies, and surveillance machines are all being more rapidly developed by world conflict. For venture capitalists, accelerating the development of new technologies -- "accelerationism" -- is a core goal and war is a natural source of technological development.
Latin America is also serving as a front for testing, with Argentina adopting AI for policing use-cases, El Salvador adopting advanced technologies from U.S. and Israel, and advanced AI technologies like Palantir and Anthropic used to capture foreign leaders in the case of Maduro, and in contravention of international law. Drone technology used in Ukraine is now being exported to combat Iran in the illegal war of Israel and the United States. Ostensively consumer AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are openly and proudly involved in the Pentagon, and at the forefront of the tech stack during a new era of warfare. With a new age of "dual use" technologies -- with applications in both the consumer world and in the theatre of war -- both realms benefit from advancement. Innovations from consumer usage feed innovations in weapons technology, and vice versa. The dual-use feedback loop accelerates the technology but also collapses the lines between military and policing use cases, and consumer products.
Need to establish a global military footprint
Venture capitalists’ new military program means they must build up military power across the world and sell weapons, AI, border and surveillance products to many foreign governments. The cold war between China and venture capital, and America itself, kicks off a new age of re-armament, and requires allied countries to host further military infrastructure. Anduril and Palantir have spoken extensively on the need for United States allies to host more and more American military power as they confront the threat of China.
In order to secure this footprint, venture capital is entering aggressive engagement with foreign governments and allies, and has particularly advocated for European countries to spend significantly more GDP on defense spending; this goal has made outstanding progress with a new NATO commitment whereby NATO members have agreed to spend 5% of their GDP on defense as of 2025. This agreement will see venture capitalists benefit from new projects, conflicts, re-armament and modernization efforts.
While selling their weapons and surveillance platforms globally, venture capitalists are subsidizing military build-outs in multiple regions. Anduril is splitting costs for military projects in the UK, while venture firms Lux Capital and 8VC fund an Anduril clone in Nigeria, building sentry towers, drones and surveillance software similar to Anduril. This indicates a new strategy of developing weapons primes within a foreign country, that are merely replicas of existing venture-funded startups, leveraging the same funding sources and technologies.
Importantly, Network State colonies also have a focal point around militarily significant sites. California Forever is located near Travis Air Force Base and plans to host numerous defense startups, while venture capitalists network closely with Palau, a key strategic military site in tensions with China. The Alpha City project in Africa includes a plan for an "Aerospace City" as new Network State projects spread across the continent, and Africa becomes the new front of the cold war.
Competition between China and Silicon Valley technological development
Silicon Valley and China's technology industry have competed for decades, particularly as each has competed for the global market in devices, semi-conductors, social media, payments, wifi, vehicles, aerospace and other key areas. With the dawn of the AI age, Taiwan, the leading manufacturer of semiconductors, is allied with the United States venture capital in a position of profound tension with China. With venture capital's move into military startups, the cold war has accelerated in the military realm.
Tension with China provides the rationale and pretense for major investments in venture capital's weapons startups and other portfolio companies by the U.S. government and its allies. Venture capitalists are vanguard China hawks in the new stage of conflict, engaging in incessant fear mongering and rhetorical escalation about the "threat" posed by China. Venture capitalists work constantly to get the United States government and its allies to buy into the "need" for expansive weapons build-outs that they supply with their technology. Venture capitalists are also using the China excuse to advocate for a massive re-armament across Europe and all American allies. Venture capitalists are now working on a new Manhattan Project, and China is the ultimate rationale and target of these programs. Venture capitalists emphasize the need for funding them as a matter of national security, opening up government money to them across a large number of verticals.
At the same time, tension with China also opens up market opportunities. Venture capitalists are in the early stages of a large-scale manufacturing build-out, featuring autonomous technologies and new, modernized factories. Tariffs on China, justified by technological competition, open up U.S. markets in manufacturing and create an exigent crisis propelling adoption of emerging manufacturing technologies.
Venture capital's ability to manufacture increasingly more anxiety and fear regarding China, is directly related to their potential market for weapons deals, entry into new markets, and government contracts and incentives.
Belt and Road initiative
China's Belt and Road Initiative has built infrastructure in partnership with governments across Latin America and Africa, including port development, bridges, roads, rail expansion, hydroelectricity projects, corporate parks, airports, water facilities and financing and loan programs. A list of these projects can be found here.
Belt and Road has strengthened ties between China and many other countries, and also makes it possible for Chinese technology and development to enter those markets. In light of American venture capital's conflict and competition with China, America's tech elite are incentivized to develop their own programs.
The Network State can be seen as a counter to the Belt and Road Initiative. While often thought of as residential areas for tech elite, the Network State is heavily focused on industry, port, military base, manufacturing and infrastructure development. In Honduras, the Network State of Próspera is developing a near-shoring hub to build manufacturing and shipping competency in the region, while hosting crypto and medical development companies. Itana, a Network State site in Nigeria, is located near a port site as well, and is being developed as a tech hub for startups and other businesses. The Alpha City project, targeting multiple countries in Africa, is similarly focused around industrial capacity in energy, AI and EVs, manufacturing and aerospace. Creating a possible template for Network State sites overseas, California Forever will be a manufacturing, shipping, residential, industrial campus and startup zone. American venture capitalists are moving into mining in Zambia and the Democratic Republic of Congo, in the same countries China also seeks mining operations. Further, Network State zones can essentially be "sold" to countries, ostensively as strategies to develop a competitive technology industry and advance their countries, but leading to a new age of exploitation.
Network State and Belt and Road are facing off across the world. The impact of venture capital influence can be seen in Honduras, which had previously recognized and worked with the PRC, but now looks to re-establish diplomatic ties with Taiwan under the Trump-installed Nasry Asfura.
Market for competitive technology industries
With the dawn of the AI age, many nations are eager to develop their own competitive tech industries, yet face a scenario where they don't have the established competencies, funding for large-scale projects, startup base, institutionalized knowledge or competitive technical schools.
Thus, they must partner with established technology giants in order to advance. Such nations are then in a position of having to choose between Chinese and American development alliances; in the latter case, becoming dependent on American tech giants and venture capital firms.
The entry point of competitive AI systems is incredibly expensive -- Larry Ellison once saying that the entry point is $100 billion as "basic stakes", "that kind of gets you in the game...". Many countries are unable to finance these projects on their own, and lack the experience and supply chain to do so. "Big tech" and venture capital have the benefit of decades of experience, thousands upon thousands of companies, and have developed their own proprietary operating strategies. This puts U.S. tech in a strong position, particularly as it moves into semiconductors and earth minerals needed to power data centers. Venture capitalists have a valuable negotiating tool and host of products to sell foreign governments.
In poorer countries, venture capitalists are able to use the promise of technological development as a negotiating point for land, adoption of their crypto financial system, building of military bases and ports, mining sites, manufacturing centers, etc. In wealthier and more developed countries, such as Saudi Arabia, the drive for a competitive industry and financial strategy propels powerful alliances.
Venture capital cartels enter countries with great leverage as the race for the new age of computing is on, and nations compete for access to the tech wealth and infrastructure needed to secure their future.
Competition and the crypto financial system
Venture capitalists are the force behind crypto -- a financial system that includes banks, payment processors, new investment products, loans and savings programs, stock exchanges, currencies, real estate, betting markets and more. Crypto is rapidly becoming a fully featured industry with the ability to threaten, subsume and replace the existing financial system.
The crypto financial system is competing with the established financial system. In every major area, cryptocurrency has offerings that compete with core parts of the American financial system, as well as established or burgeoning economies in other parts of the world.
Because crypto is fundamentally in competition with the "legacy" financial system, venture capitalists are incentivized to attack the existing financial system. Existing financial rules and regulatory bodies have posed a fundamental threat to crypto, requiring venture capitalists to go to extreme lengths to secure the future of their platforms, building a robust and aggressive lobbying function. They themselves have contributed to a significant weakness in the existing financial infrastructure, as cutting edge technical development has gone into creating the crypto system, not into maintaining or modernizing existing financial platforms and applications.
There is often confusion about the relationship of crypto to existing currencies, and while Peter Thiel and other tech elite indicate their strategy is to replace the dollar, much of what venture capital is doing is pushing to tokenize existing currencies, including the dollar, through stablecoins; this means subsuming and subordinating these existing assets, and making them profitable and productive to venture capitalists.
The crypto model involves both establishing a new financial system as well as absorbing important functions of the existing system.
Drive for global penetration of crypto
Venture capitalists need to install crypto and drive adoption around the world. Latin America and Africa are key markets. In each market, venture capital must develop a strategy to gain adoption from consumers, investors, the enterprise and incumbent financial institutions, as well as secure favorable regulations from governments.
The Network State serves a key role here, backed by powerful crypto companies, allowing venture capitalists to set up a presence in foreign governments and escape taxes and regulations, particularly on crypto. Network States and other colonial projects provide the legal and regulatory tissue needed to install cryptocurrency in countries.
In order to install cryptocurrency and other venture capital agendas, they are backing far-right politicians in the U.S., foreign far-right politicians like Bukele, as well as AfD elite who promote cryptocurrency and special economic zones. They are also backing fintech companies in Latin America, like Nubank, while engaging in global crypto schemes like trading biometric scanning for crypto in the case of Worldcoin. Venture capitalists pursue consumer adoption through unethical and irresponsible platforms like Polymarket and memecoins, which they heavily manipulate, causing major losses to users.
Making crypto successful and thus securing venture capital returns requires global adoption. This puts venture capital into the existential drive to attack the sovereign financial systems of other countries, hoping to absorb, supplant and dominate them. This requires ground attacks, installing politicians, the creation of crypto hubs in the form of the Network State, weakening foreign regulatory bodies, and preying on local populations.
The new crypto stock market / Startup IPOs and exits
Many people think of crypto as simply being about cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana and Dogecoin. However, crypto has a broad range of financial products. One of the biggest ones is a new crypto stock market operated by venture capital companies.
Coinbase and Robinhood, two of the largest crypto companies, are offering stock trading and expanding their platforms to encompass all asset classes. Coinbase is building what it calls the "Everything Exchange," and has launched crypto-backed mortgages in partnership with Fannie Mae.
Venture capital's chief assets are startups. Venture capitalists have a backlog of thousands of companies that have not exited via an acquisition or an IPO, which allow venture capitalists to get returns through an "exit event". Thus, they face a serious liquidity problem, as their money is still tied up in these startups. A 2024 report states that "The VC industry has a $1.2 trillion problem: It manages far more assets than the exit markets can currently absorb... The combination of large portfolios and low exits suggests that a massive turnaround in tech IPOs is needed to return VC to the performance that underpins its reputation." The current IPO market has seen poor performance of tech stocks in recent years, while the IPO market has recovered somewhat in 2025 and 2026. However, amidst a turbulent economy, exit pressure remains high.
Venture capitalists are building out the infrastructure to allow more of their startups to exit in novel ways through its crypto financial platforms. These platforms will allow venture capitalists to get returns on their investments and raise investment in diverse ways, such as "initial coin offerings", new index funds that give exposure to startups (such as Robinhood's Ventures Fund), and tokenized stocks.
Expansion into nuclear energy and mining operations
Venture capitalists' increasing investments in mining are driven by profit opportunity as well as their own supply chain requirements for minerals like uranium, cobolt, copper, lithium and others need to power their computing projects. These endeavors promise an edge in their tenuous relationship the tech giants, allowing them to get into the very foundation of the supply chain.
One venture capital mining company, KoBold Metals, used AI to find a massive copper deposit in Zambia and subsequently make a deal with its government for mining rights. Now, the United States is threatening to withhold HIV aid to Zambia unless access to minerals is expanded. KoBold is now engaging in a large scale exploration of the Democratic Republic of Congo for lithium. The company, funded by Andreessen Horowitz, calls it the "largest-ever campaign" for lithium discovery.
Investments in mining companies bring venture capitalists deep into regions in Latin America and Africa, and require negotiations with host governments, incentivizing them to pursue favorable regimes, up to and including installing new governments, as well as new Network State cites, such as the many proposed across Africa.
Meanwhile, the enormous datacenter buildout opens opportunities for nuclear energy plays. In order to deliver AI computing, tech and venture capital must build low-latency data centers across the world, and a power grid that can support them. This requires large global infrastructure projects.
To meet this demand, venture capitalists have invested heavily in nuclear energy startups, opening them up to the global energy markets. These nuclear power plants can be used outside of data center use cases as well, making domination of the global energy market a possible outcome. For venture capitalists who had traditionally worked at the software layer, this move puts them closer and closer to underlying commodities, and is a dangerous expansion in scope.
Pink Tide
The "Pink Tide" refers to the rise of leftist governments across the 1990s thru present day in Latin America. This period has seen a flourishing of leftist regimes, now being reversed as right-wing politicians make progress across the region. This coincides with venture capitalists attacking Latin America as a market for cryptocurrency, land, ports, manufacturing and mining, locations for the Network State, and a more powerful position in the cold war with China.
Leftist presence in Latin America poses a threat to ongoing operations. Venture capitalists have become aggressive actors backing the rise of the right.
An important case study is Honduras, where venture capitalists have established the Network State colony of Próspera. Former president Xiomara Castro took drastic steps to expel Próspera from the country. Doctors in Honduras have fought unregulated medical testing on the site, and the Supreme Court declared the special economic zone [ZEDE] unconstitutional.
However, Castro has been replaced with a government led by Nasry Asfura, a right-wing politician championed by Donald Trump; Trump threatened to cut support for Honduras if it didn't elect Asfura leading up to the election. Asfura is from the same political party that allowed Próspera into the country. Nasry Asfura is now securing the Network State's position as Próspera takes aggressive steps to cement their sovereignty and establish ports and trade.
In Argentina, venture capitalists have backed far-right politician and now president Javiar Milei, who has gutted the government, implemented sweeping labor abuse policies, installed AI policing programs, and opened up the country to foreign investment, especially from the tech class. Bukele, dictator of El Salvador, had adopted a crypto-based financial agenda while enjoying the support of the tech fascist elite.
Venezuela's Maduro was an outspoken critic of Silicon Valley tech fascism, and shut down access to X citing election interference. Involved in a public fight with Elon Musk, Maduro has since been illegally kidnapped by the United States government, leveraging AI technology including Palantir and Anthropic. X has also entered into conflict with the leftist government of Brazil, while tech fascists vocally supported the 2019 coup in Bolivia, with Elon Musk famously stating "We will coup whoever we want! Deal with it."
Venture capitalists and the tech class frequently talk about the threat of leftism ("wokeism") and communism, particularly in the context of China, Latin American regimes, and youth movements in the United States. These movements and regimes are a threat to their geopolitical activity. In order to ensure a comfortable operating environment, venture capitalists are working across Latin America to back right-wing politicians that will sign up for their programs of border control, drones, AI policing, foreign investment, mega-projects, cryptocurrency, and the Network State.
Venture capitalists are opposed to leftist governments globally, but Latin America is the most advanced case in their interference in regimes outside of the United States.
Vulnerability of American democracy to corruption and corporate capture
American democracy has proven itself extraordinarily vulnerable to tech fascism. Large corporate donations from tech companies and the tech class have played a key role in Trump's election, with SpaceX and Andreessen Horowitz among the largest donors, alongside massive involvement from crypto PACs. Politicians seek to appease the tech class in order to gain their significant financial support, and ultimately adopt their policy platforms.
Due to corruption of the government by the tech class, tech executives have been increasingly appointed to government positions, including in the military, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Office of Personnel Management, while new roles have been created for tech elite in Detachment 201 and the newly-created President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, consisting of leaders Marc Andreessen, Larry Ellison, crypto VC Fred Ehrsam, and Mark Zuckerberg, among others.
Regulatory bodies have lacked the ability to defend themselves across administrations and are faced with an onslaught of sophisticated attacks by tech fascists, including coordinated pushes for industry-designed legislation (such as the CLARITY Act), and bribery of politicians backed by crypto funding. Social media owned by tech billionaires is used to forward their political agenda, radicalizing their base and steering voting behavior.
While much attention has been focused on tech capture of the Republican party, the Democrats have played a large role in the development of tech fascism. California, a Democrat stronghold, gave venture capitalists many different kinds of tax breaks, including the infamous Mid-Market Tax Breaks, and a catastrophically permissive regulatory environment. The government of California, continuously in the hands of Democrats, did almost nothing to prevent the accumulation of wealth, power and influence that metastasized into the tech fascism we see today. Tech also gained huge government support through Obama, called the "first tech president", and a champion of the industry during a period of rapid growth.
The U.S. government has failed to implement protective tax measures. Inefficiencies in the government and lack of adaptability to rapidly growing tech wealth and power have made it possible for the tech industry to outmaneuver it. In the case of Donald Trump, venture capitalists have assumed unprecedented positions in the government, and are bringing many more of their people inside, where they can remain in the event of a reversion to a Democratic presidency. DOGE has been a central force in tech elite taking command of the U.S. government. Ultimately, the government's dependency on the technology industry to run all of its IT also creates a conflict of interest.
The reality is that the tech industry is able to manipulate the political system, elections, candidates, policy, taxation and regulation, and geopolitics, and has for many years; under the Trump administration, this has advanced to the level of corporate coup.
Regulations
Because venture capitalists operate thousands of companies across dozens of verticals, they face an overwhelming challenge with regulations, particularly as the regulations that other industries function under are prohibitive to their timelines, development and financing strategies. Because venture capital is often bringing new technologies to market, there are not regulatory frameworks set up to advance their development. This has been particularly clear in the case of crypto, which has required new regulatory practices, many achieved with election donations, crypto super PACs, lobbying and corruption of regulatory bodies through DOGE and government appointments.
At any given point in time, venture capital's thousands of startups are mired in regulatory conflict with the FDA, the EPA, the IRS, the SEC, the FTC, the FFC, the CFPB and the FDIC, while facing various criminal, class action and civil lawsuits. They face regulations at the federal, state and local levels, and frequently violate laws. These proceedings and processes significantly slow down the development and deployment speed of new technologies. Complying with regulations becomes a chief bottleneck in startup development and deployment. Enforcement curtails their criminal activities.
As a result, venture capitalists have resorted to extreme strategies such as DOGE, getting an Andreessen Horowitz executive appointed into the Office of Personnel Management, and a Peter Thiel venture capitalist as head of the HHS, then interim head of the CDC, now nominated for head of the National Science Foundation. Venture capitalists have worked to use executive powers to remove regulatory authority from states in the case of artificial intelligence. As venture capitalists develop and sell technologies throughout global markets, they are also pushing to gut regulations and government in other countries, as in the case of JD Vance pressuring Europe to remove AI regulations.
Tax evasion
Despite using standard tax evasion strategies, the venture capital class still pays large amounts of taxes that take cash out of their ecosystem. Venture capital relies heavily on cash in order to fund its startups, and their access to cash is what makes it possible to rapidly build out companies and infrastructure. Venture capitalists could start and grow companies more rapidly if they didn't have to pay taxes. The burden is felt both at the corporate level and by individuals of the tech elite and their wealthy employees; when venture capitalists, executives and the tech class have major exit events -- such as an acquisition or IPO -- the tax burden is high and represents large amounts of cash leaving their bank accounts and overall economy.
As they look to accelerate technological development, taxation becomes a greater and greater impediment. The development of the Network State is related to tax evasion, with a prominent feature being registration of technology companies in tax-friendly digital zones in Nigeria, Honduras, Palau and others, or through favorable administrations like Milei's in Argentina and Bukele in El Salvador, both of which have offered tax relief for foreign investment.
These zones and policy frameworks offer perks to venture capitalists including little or no capital gains tax, income tax, 0% capital repatriation, corporate tax, development tax and other taxes, as well as streamlined corporate registration. This allows venture capital to operate within a country, even on their own land, under extremely favorable conditions.
The idea for the Network State as a global network of tax havens developed alongside the crypto financial system, as a strategy to avoid trillions of dollars on crypto wealth as it evolved. The Network State gives them massive workarounds in the taxation system, both by the United States as well as in host countries. These tax benefits also help secure crypto technology as a tax shelter for crypto investors and holders more generally.
As venture capital seeks to escape its obligations, it is important to note that venture capital consumes the resources of the American government and its people in order to survive. Venture capital has grown to its size and power through American labor, grants, contracts, subsidies, tax breaks, tech workers educated through the public school systems, and cities in the Bay Area who supported its growth. Venture capital's trajectory proposes an astronomical amount of money leaving the country, and an ongoing theft from citizens.
Creation of the tech worker class
The tech giants and venture capitalists have created a large population of extremely privileged workers. Many tech workers have significant income as well as stock in the startups they work at, establishing a large wealth gap not only in the Bay Area, but in the many other areas, such as Texas and Florida, where tech elite are expanding their footprint.
Meta pays its programmers a yearly salary of up to $450,000 and more, not including stock packages and bonuses; this type of outrageous compensation is endemic across big tech, while startup employees often make more than millions of dollars in exit events. The Bay Area is home to at least 342,400 millionaires, and hosts 82 billionaires.
The position of the tech class -- in designing systems that exploit, oppress and steal from other workers, while attaining a position in the top wealth categories -- has destroyed any possible solidarity with larger social movements. Because of the disproportionate wealth and power programmers have, they are a useful body for venture capitalists to deploy more broadly. Highly paid technologists were used to gentrify large parts of the Bay Area, to squash internal resistance to tech radicalization, and to build technologies that oppressed other groups.
In the new "AI bubble", or web 3.0, tech workers are used as a radicalized body to push venture capital agendas, advance and populate the Network State, and move money into the crypto ecosystem. The significant financial privilege of this class makes them a critical bloc to move onto crypto infrastructure, as venture capitalists work to move as much of their money as possible into its new financial infrastructure.
Despite the programming workforce facing more precarious conditions as a result of AI, this is not resulting in a broader internal movement against tech; programmers still see themselves as a separate class, and are aligned with the tech power structure, which offers them material benefits as well as the ability to oppress others. And while not all programmers will retain their hold on the privileged upper echelon of the industry, many will.
Living in a bubble, deeply aligned and subservient to venture capitalists, tech workers have uncritically absorbed the tremendous propaganda campaigns orchestrated by tech elite, and are now a deeply radicalized body with explicitly anti-democratic, imperial and colonial ideologies.
Concentration of sociopaths, psychopaths and narcissists
Success in the ultra elite of the venture capital class requires a catastrophic level of sadism, willingness to abandon morals and ethics, and desire to commit major crimes. The people at the head of venture capital are widely recognized by the public as sociopaths, psychopaths and narcissists. Numerous studies have found that corporate senior executives have a higher degree of psychopathy and sociopathy than is found in the general population. While this phenomenon is pervasive across the corporate world and military, venture capitalists are in a unique position of influence as the funders of technological innovation.
A New Yorker exposé of Sam Altman states:
"... Altman has a relentless will to power that, even among industrialists who put their names on spaceships, sets him apart. 'He’s unconstrained by truth,' the board member told us. 'He has two traits that are almost never seen in the same person. The first is a strong desire to please people, to be liked in any given interaction. The second is almost a sociopathic lack of concern for the consequences that may come from deceiving someone.'
The board member was not the only person who, unprompted, used the word 'sociopathic.' One of Altman’s batch mates in the first Y Combinator cohort was Aaron Swartz, a brilliant but troubled coder who died by suicide in 2013 and is now remembered in many tech circles as something of a sage. Not long before his death, Swartz expressed concerns about Altman to several friends. 'You need to understand that Sam can never be trusted,' he told one. 'He is a sociopath. He would do anything.'"
Startups and venture capital firms select for these traits. Opening positions to people who follow culturally accepted moral codes would be a liability to the core project.
Venture capital culture is notorious for trolling, visible in stunts like the Peter Thiel anti-christ lectures; studies have found that trolls have a high rate of sadism, narcissism, sociopath and psychopathy. Top venture capitalists are willing and enthused to commit serious crimes including treason, war crimes, genocide and mass surveillance, while internally maintaining a culture of sexual harassment and abuse, and maximum extortion of the communities they reside in.
COVID
COVID saw an astronomic increase in tech wealth, with the pandemic producing a boom in usage, profits and valuations of the industry. The tech industry doubled its wealth during the pandemic. This significant expansion pushed venture capital and tech to a new size, where it was able to start asserting fresh, unilateral power. Money made over this period was used to jumpstart the new agenda of election interference, colonialism, imperialism and geopolitical power. Concentration within the venture capital space accelerated during this time.
The early years of the pandemic were important to the adoption of crypto products. Social media usage hit all time highs as people were in lockdowns and using social distancing. Because of their financial power, the tech class was relatively insulated from the negative impacts of the pandemic, creating a new level of isolation and elitism. It also offered proof that when the rest of the world was struck by catastrophe, venture capital and the tech class could thrive. Gains from this period also left them with a significant tax burden, accelerating efforts to create tax shelters through the Network State.
Destruction of the Bay Area
Venture capital and big tech have had devastating impacts on the Bay area, resulting in massive wealth gaps, poverty, lack of public services, increased policing and police violence, the shuttering of local businesses, and demographic shifts towards a white population with the displacement of people of color.
From the San Francisco Examiner:
"San Francisco used to be a hub of Black culture. But after decades of structural racism, The City’s Black core has been pushed out of its seven-by-seven grid to the surrounding suburbs — or out of the Bay Area and state entirely.
In 1970, there were about 96,000 Black people in San Francisco, according to U.S. Census Bureau counts, accounting for 13.5% of its population — a high point for The City’s share of Black residents. By 2020, the Black population in San Francisco had dwindled to about 45,000, comprising just 5.1% of its population, most of whom are among The City’s most disadvantaged residents and confined to the Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood.
Maps of San Francisco’s changing demographics make visible the erosion of The City’s Black population each decade from the 1960s to 2020, the year of the most recent census."
The tech class has consistently used the excuse of marginalized populations to mount police technology, such as ShotSpotter and Flock, and broadly backing the police force amidst rampant police violence; per the Bay Area Equity Atlas:
"Over the nine-year period of 2016 to 2024 combined, the rate of use of force incidents on Black civilians was about 43 per 100,000 compared with only 10 per 100,000 overall. The overwhelming majority of law enforcement use-of-force incidents involve men. Of the nearly 773 use-of-force incidents between law enforcement and civilians in the nine-county Bay Area from 2016 to 2024, nearly 70 percent resulted in serious bodily injury to civilians and about 21 percent resulted in civilian death."
Tech has long backed crackdowns on unhoused persons, drug addicts and sex workers, by making significant donations to police departments, providing technology to police forces, hiring police to serve as private security on their campuses, and backing pro-police political candidates. They have moved into oppressed areas of San Francisco, particularly the Tenderloin, with promises to "revitalize" the areas, leading only to more wealth inequality, displacement and broken promises. Massive gentrification across the Bay, caused by tech wealth, the extreme wealth gap, and real estate speculation, devastated the region. Venture capitalist's use of the Bay Area as a laboratory -- initial grounds for Uber/Lyft, Taskrabbit, Instacart, Flock, AirBnb, Skydio, Waymo and others -- have contributed significantly to income inequality, precarious jobs, gentrification, surveillance and displacement.
Despite creating the socioeconomic problems in the Bay Area, the tech class has seen themselves as victims of it. This sense of victimization has radicalized the tech class against the poor, the Black community, immigrants, sex workers, drug users and other groups. Their own destruction and extraction of the region has made San Francisco uninhabitable to them; this is one motivation behind the Network State project California Forever. The vision of California Forever -- in Solano County, and only a short drive away from San Francisco and Oakland -- is one of an exclusive, wealthy community that consists solely of the tech elite and the tech class, while relying on Bay Area labor to do construction of the city. The goal is a tech class isolated from the impact of their activities on the local population, while still able to extract from it. As California Forever proceeds with a vast construction project, signing the largest construction deal ever, the stage is set for workers to be entrapped in a new era of exploitation for the purposes of building an elite city that will not house them. They are building a new city after having devastated San Francisco.
Negative media coverage of tech and venture capital
In the first internet bubble, venture capital and their startups received a lot of positive media coverage. They benefitted from industry-specific publications, including TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Wired and GigaOM, that were minimally critical and largely funded by venture capitalists through advertising and event sponsorship. Media coverage in the mainstream was also in favor of venture capitalists, and technology was seen as a liberal, positive and even democratizing force.
Over time, reporting on tech in both industry and mainstream press became increasingly negative, as the damaging effects of their companies and projects spread. The bad press threatens venture capital's bottom line, has undermined confidence in the sector, demoralized and lost them workers, opened them up to lawsuits, and caused them personal distress and ego wounds.
Venture capitalists now seek to create a press that is favorable to them and their companies. This has motivated them to take over key media infrastructure, like X and Paramount, as well as develop their own media ecosystem. They permit extremism on their platforms, ramp up censorship and suppression through shadowbanning and algorithmic feeds, and promote their propaganda. They have also started their own media apparatuses, including Andreessen Horowitz's media accelerator program, publications like Palladium and Pirate Wires and platforms like Substack that host and promote extremist content, including Nazism. The Network State has created a host of media projects, from events and magazines to podcasts and books, while crypto startups produce an array of NFT projects, virtual reality projects, conferences, live spaces and more.
Their goal is to squash dissent, create a media blackout, and develop a new age of "techno-optimist" media that supports their startups and geopolitical goals, using platforms like X to bolster right wing extremists and politicians.
Conflict with social justice movements and visibility into global resistance efforts
Venture capitalists' thousands of startups have consistently attacked marginalized people, workers, their housing, communities, safety, health and jobs. This has made the tech industry a primary target of social unrest. Venture capitalists are now mounting a reactionary movement of their own.
Movements and inequality within the tech industry
Tech fascists often talk about the "tech lash" and the interior backlash from workers in the industry across the web 2.0 bubble. Within the industry, venture capitalists faced significant pressure against racism, sexism, unequal pay and equity, and poor working conditions, including exploitative work hours, sexual harassment on the job, and wealth inequality.
The tech lash was led by a movement of marginalized tech workers and their allies to improve working conditions and strengthen diversity in the field. The tech industry has a high degree of misogyny, with voluminous under-representation of women, and a high attrition rate of women from the field -- a pattern seen across other marginalized demographics. People of color, Black people and particularly Black women have faced the deep racism of the field, leading to such outrageous outcomes as "only 3.47 percent of the founders seeking funding from VC firms were Black, suggesting there are systemic barriers for Black founders to get these opportunities. But even among those that have made it into the VC pipeline, startups founded by Black entrepreneurs raised only a third of the amount raised by non-Black-founded startups." Black women represent just 3% of tech workers.
While tech companies initially made some effort to reform in line with the workers movement, it was quickly stamped out as the movement began making greater demands that would require major shifts in allocation of capital to marginalized groups, and particularly, giving them equity in venture-backed companies. For venture capitalists, allowing this movement risked permanent friction and sharing of power and capital with people outside of the white male-dominated tech class. This period saw significant attacks on tech activists involving 4Chan, 8Chan, Reddit, Y Combinator's Hacker News, and Twitter, with strong evidence of direct venture capital involvement still coming out today.
The web 3.0 or "AI" bubble has seen a reactionary counter-movement against DEI and "wokeism", with VC-backed companies implementing what they call "MEI" or "merit, excellence and intelligence." Reforms to the industry have been rolled back and the representation of marginalized groups in tech is at risk as programs dedicated to improving representation and equality have been revoked. Tech layoffs, rising quickly due to AI automation, disproportionately affect underrepresented groups and hide industry purges as venture capitalists work to eliminate diversity gains and secure a right-wing technology culture.
Over the years, the venture capital class has come up with a number of frameworks to justify the endemic discrimination in the field, from the "10x engineer," the supremacy of "shape rotators" vs "wordcels", and the idea of inherent IQ and IQ superiority. The frameworks have allowed venture capitalists to justify the misogynist and racist practices of the field and the exclusion of non-White men as a matter of inherent racial, genetic and gender superiority. The ongoing purge of marginalized people and their influence from the industry leads to a more homogenous, radicalized and bigoted environment.
Pressure from progressive movements
In the Bay Area more broadly, tech companies faced anti-gentrification movements, and movements of what has been called the "invisible workforce": workers in low-paid jobs for the tech class such as drivers, security workers, cleaning professionals, culinary workers, etc.
The development of the extractive gig economy model also brought venture capitalists into conflict with workers around the world. Their use of supply chains implicating child labor for cobalt extraction, and their contributions to climate change through datacenter build outs, have caused major backlash. Tech's role in both corporate and state surveillance has been a constant source of friction with many populations, with a major nexus point in the Snowden revelations of 2013. Harassment, abuse, and gendered violence on social media platforms from Instagram to Twitter, Reddit and others have consistently put pressure on tech companies and the tech elite.
Now, the new age of ICE activity -- addressed in the #NoTechforICE movement -- and use of technology in the genocide of Palestinians, have amplified social tensions with tech companies more than ever before, with venture capitalists specifically going after school systems due to "DEI" policies and pro-Palestine student protests on campuses.
Anti-Blackness and Black social movements
The anti-blackness of the industry can be seen in demographics, wealth distribution, impact on Bay Area communities, industry rhetoric, and labor exploitation. The belief in "IQ supremacy" serves as a thin veneer over anti-blackness, as it is deployed by their most extreme ideologues.
The George Floyd uprising in 2020 was a major catalyst for venture capital escalation, including the founding of Pirate Wires, a Peter Thiel-linked "parallel media" platform. The Pirate Wires founder stated: "This company began as a single newsletter in the batshit crazy summer of 2020, back when rioting was effectively legalized, and the country lost its mind. Locked in my home by fools and maniacs, I watched San Francisco crumble, and read about it all in horror from prominent writers throughout the press who considered this not only normal, but necessary. I disagreed, and I realized fairly quickly I was not alone."
Venture capitalists have consistently radicalized against Black resistance. Sharing the Bay area with Oakland, tech witnessed significant uprisings against the Oscar Grant murder at Fruitville Station, and a few years later, the Ferguson protests, where Oakland was a key location. Andreessen Horowitz hired Daniel Penny, the killer of 30-year old Black man Jordan Neely, in a show of support for the execution of Black men, in 2025.
Black people have been the most underrepresented demographic among tech workers. Only 0.4% of venture capital dollars goes to startups with a Black founder. While white women have been the primary beneficiaries of diversity in tech efforts, representation and funding of Black people remains dire.
Much of tech's radicalization is based on their desire to oppress Black people and make sure there will be no repercussions for violence against Black people. Black activism has been at the forefront of progressive politics, and thus a key target of venture capitalists. While venture capitalists seek to squash all progressive activism, their first target is Black people in the United States. Now, their incursions into Africa are expanding through retina scanning, mining operations, crypto, medical experiments and the Network State. The rising oppression of Black people by venture capitalists is global, as African countries now come under their crosshairs.
Visibility into global movements
Because of their monopoly on social media, venture capitalists have been able to surveil global social movements and social resistance with an unprecedented level of visibility. Arab Spring, Ferguson, Occupy Wall Street and #MeToo unfolded on their platforms, while venture capitalists also had visibility into social movements across many countries at the same time. They had more simultaneous views of global resistance against capitalism than any other power in world history. This has contributed to the rampant anti-communism in the venture capital class.
Combined antagonisms with workers and marginalized people, and the tech classes' view into global resistance movements, created an urgent need to keep global anti-capitalist struggle in check.